Following Pennsylvania’s first and only debate between U.S. Senate candidates Dr. Mehmet Oz and John Fetterman Tuesday night, the Oz campaign declared victory and said their Republican candidate would best "represent all Pennsylvanians."
The Oz campaign released a statement shortly after the debate concluded that said Dr. Oz, a celebrity doctor, would "find common-sense solutions to lower costs for families."
The campaign also argued that Fetterman, a Democrat and the state’s Lieutenant Governor, has "radical and dangerous policies" that would "put criminals over Pennsylvania families."
"The contrast between Dr. Oz and John Fetterman was clear during tonight's debate. Radical John Fetterman couldn't defend why he has repeatedly pushed for extreme policies like decriminalizing heroin, banning fracking, and pardoning cold-blooded murderers," said Oz Campaign Manager Casey Contres. "Dr. Oz articulated how he would restore balance to Washington and find common-sense solutions to lower costs for families and make our streets safer."
PENNSYLVANIA SENATE DEBATE: OZ, FETTERMAN SPAR OVER ABORTION, DEM WON’T SAY WHEN LIMITS SHOULD BE
During the debate, the two candidates answered questions about abortion, fracking, and crime.
On the issue of abortion, Fetterman said the procedure should be legalized by Congress while Oz said there should be a conversation between "a woman, her doctor, [and] local political leaders."
"There should not be involvement from the federal government in how states decide their abortion decisions," Oz said. "As a physician, I've been in the room when there are some difficult conversations happening. I don't want the federal government involved with that at all. I want women, doctors, local political leaders, letting the democracy that's always allowed our nation to thrive, to put the best ideas forward so states can decide for themselves."
The Republican also said he would support drilling for oil and natural gas, commonly known as fracking — an issue that is particularly important to Pennsylvania voters. However, Fetterman, who previously opposed fracking, seemed to reverse this stance during the debate.
"I've always supported fracking and I always believe that independence with our energy is critical, and we can't be held, you know, ransom to somebody like Russia," Fetterman said. "I've always believed that energy independence is critical and I've always believed that — and I do support fracking, never taken any money from their industry, but I support how critical it is that we produce our energy and create energy independence."
FETTERMAN STUMBLES DURING DEBATE WHEN QUESTIONED ABOUT FLIP-FLOP ON SUPPORT FOR FRACKING
Pressed by the moderator on how he would "square" his previous comments against this new position, Fetterman said: "I do support fracking, and I don’t, I don’t — I support fracking, and I stand, and I do support fracking."
The two candidates found common ground on the U.S. Supreme Court and on preventing additional seats from being added.
When asked if the highest court in the country should expand its number of justices, Fetterman answered: "I don't believe in that."
"It’s not about changing the rules. It’s about acknowledging where we’re at," he added.
Oz similarly said he would not change the court’s current nine-member bench: "I would never touch the makeup of the Supreme Court."
The crucial Pennsylvania Senate race has drawn national attention including endorsements from former President Donald Trump, who backs Oz, and President Joe Biden, who is backing Fetterman.
The Senate’s current 50-50 tie has made each race in the upper chamber particularly important as both Republicans and Democrats are intent on winning a majority.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The two candidates are running to fill a U.S. Senate seat to represent Pennsylvania which will be vacated by a retiring Pat Toomey. Toomey, who has been a senator since 2011, will be retiring at the end of his term on January 3, 2023.
Several national polls show Oz still trailing Fetterman by about 2.3 points — or within the margin of error.