Minnesota Gov. Walz was legally allowed to mandate masks, appellate court rules
Court denied lab leak origins were 'likely,' thereby protecting COVID response under state law
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Gov. Tim Walz had the legal authority to mandate face masks when he declared a public health emergency in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled Monday.
WI OFFICIALS DROP FINES FOR DANCE STUDIO THAT HOSTED 'NUTCRACKER' PERFORMANCE DURING COVID
Walz declared a peacetime emergency in March 2020 and mandated masking in most indoor public spaces in July 2020. The conservative Upper Midwest Law Center sued, challenging the mask requirement as unconstitutional. Walz lifted the mandate in May 2021, at which point the Court of Appeals declared the case moot.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The Minnesota Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled that Democratic Gov. Tim Walz had the legal authority to mandate face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. (Glen Stubbe/Star Tribune via AP)
But the Minnesota Supreme Court in February sent the case back to the appeals court to settle the key legal question behind the case: whether the Minnesota Emergency Management Act of 1996 authorizes a governor to declare a peacetime emergency during a public health emergency such as the pandemic. The high court called it an "important issue of statewide significance."
SPAIN CALLS AN END TO COVID-19 HEALTH CRISIS AND OBLIGATORY USE OF MASKS IN HOSPITALS, PHARMACIES
The appeals court rejected as "unreasonable" the plaintiffs' assertions that the coronavirus "most likely" originated from a laboratory leak, so that the resulting pandemic did not occur "naturally" and therefore was not an "act of nature" under the state law.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The appeals court used similar legal reasoning earlier this year when it rejected arguments by a woman who had been convicted of operating a wine bar and restaurant in Albert Lea in violation of the governor's pandemic orders.