Baby born from 27-year-old frozen embryo
Molly’s arrival broke previous record held by her sister
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}There’s a mere 18-month age gap between this proud mom and her baby – and thanks to the wonders of science, the record-breaking infant is technically 27 years old.
Molly Everette Gibson was born from an embryo that was frozen in October 1992 – only 18 months after her mother, Tina, now 29, was born in April 1991.
“It’s hard to wrap your head around it,” Tina told The Post from her home in Knoxville, Tennessee. “But, as far as we’re concerned, Molly is our little miracle.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}According to researchers at the University of Tennessee Preston Medical Library, the girl enters the history books as the longest-frozen embryo known to result in a live birth.
POOR SPERM QUALITY LINKED TO LAPTOP AND PHONE USE AT NIGHT, STUDY SAYS
Remarkably, Molly’s October 26 arrival broke the previous record held by her sister, Emma Wren, who spent 24 years on ice before her delivery in November 2017.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The embryos were frozen together and are full genetic siblings. They were thawed nearly three years apart at the National Embryo Donation Center (NEDC) before their respective transfers into Tina’s uterus.
Since they were donated anonymously, their biological parents remain unknown.
“It is very rewarding for me to see an embryo that was frozen years ago result in the birth of a lovely baby,” said NEDC lab director Carol Sommerfelt. “I feel honored to be part of the process.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The previous was record was held by her sister, who was born from an embryo that was frozen 24 years prior. (iStock)
Tina and her husband, Benjamin, 36, first turned to the NEDC after trying naturally for their own child over the course of five years. Benjamin has cystic fibrosis, which can cause infertility.
The pair, married now for 10 years, had previously fostered kids and were considering traditional adoption. But, in early 2017, Tina’s parents told them about the non-profit organization after watching an item about it on the local TV news.
“We were like, ‘That sounds crazy. No, thank you, we’re not interested,’ ” recalled Tina of the prospect to conceive with a donor embryo. “Then we kept thinking about it and couldn’t get it out of our minds.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}They visited the center (conveniently based in their home city) and were presented with the profiles of around 300 strangers who had donated spare embryos following IVF treatment.
BABY ALLEGEDLY BORN CORONAVIRUS ANTIBODIES PROMPTS CLOSER LOOK AT VIRUS' IMPACT ON PREGNANCY
“We weren’t picky,” said Tina, who works as an elementary school teacher. “We just wanted a baby.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Nonetheless, they narrowed down the choice to couples who were short in stature — “we’re both small people,” laughed Tina — before considering the donors’ health backgrounds. They finally selected the embryo that later became Emma in March 2017.
Tina only discovered on the day of the transfer that it had been frozen for 24 years. “I asked the specialist, Dr. Jeffrey Keenan: ‘What does that mean?’ ” she remembered. “And he replied: ‘Well, it could be a world record.’
“I trusted him.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Emma turned out to be the light of their lives. After a couple of years, the Gibsons wanted to provide her with a brother or sister. It was a no-brainer deciding to transfer the two remaining embryos from the same donors.
Dr. Sommerfelt, who once again supervised the delicate thawing process, told The Post: “As long as the embryos are maintained correctly in the liquid nitrogen storage tank at minus 396 degrees, we feel they may be good indefinitely.
“With the birth of Molly, we know they can survive at least 27 and a half years and probably longer.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}The Gibsons’ second daughter was delivered weighing 6 pounds and 13 ounces after a relatively straightforward labor.
It hasn’t fazed them that Molly is considered something of “a big deal” in medical circles. Tina added: “To us, it’s more unbelievable that we have two precious little children that we never thought we could have.
“We hold Molly — this itty bitty baby — and we feel blessed.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}MOM WITH CORONAVIRUS GIVES BIRTH TO TWINS WHILE IN COMA
As for Molly’s big sister, she seems unruffled by the loss of her record as the ultimate “snowflake baby,” the often-used colloquial term for frozen embryos.
“They might have to fight it out when they get older,” quipped Tina.
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}In the meantime, Emma is “obsessed” with the 5-week-old, and constantly wants to pick her up. She was thrilled to receive a special doll when Molly joined the household. The tot named the toy after her sister and, according to Mom “copies everything we do [to the baby] with her doll.”
Looking ahead, Ben and Tina are already discussing plans to expand their loving family.
Next time, it will likely be done through conventional adoption. They can’t get the girls another biological sibling from the NEDC, after all. “We’ve used up all the ‘genetic’ embryos to get Emma and Molly,” concluded Tina. “For them, we will forever be thankful.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}Facts about ‘old’ embryos
Dr. Brian Levine, practice director of Manhattan fertility clinic CCRM, told The Post that frozen embryos do not have a known shelf life.Still, it is important to consider that those put on ice in the 1980s and 1990s “have potential for degradation over time” since the “slow freeze” technique used by specialists back then could “create vulnerabilities.”
TWIN SISTERS GIVE BIRTH ON SHARED BIRTHDAY JUST 90 MINUTES APART
Although he said there is no evidence that the slow-freezing could lead to any “defects or disabilities” in future offspring, “My concern would be fragility in the [in vitro fertilization (IVF)] environment,” said Levine. “Whereas the embryos of the new millennia will likely last and perform far superior to those frozen in the 1990s.”
{{#rendered}} {{/rendered}}This is due to today’s use of vitrification, also known as flash freezing, and the ability to test embryos on a viability scale.
Levine added that many storage facilities contain decades-old embryos because a lot of IVF parents don’t want to dispose of the leftover fruit of their loins.“They feel emotionally attached to these embryos they worked so hard to create,” he said. “Being asked to discard them is emotionally taxing, so it’s easier just to pay a yearly rent [typically between $500 and $1,000] for the storage.”